The study evaluated the effects of violet-blue light (VBL) on cell viability and replication, carbonylation of three structural proteins (S, E, and N) and one nonstructural protein (NSP13), and direct damage to the RNA of SARS-CoV-2. The virus was exposed to increasing doses of VBL along with influenza A and B viruses to compare their susceptibility. At the highest dose (21.6 J/cm2), SARS-CoV-2 was significantly more susceptible to VBL than the influenza viruses, with a reduction in viral titer of 2.33 log10. Viral RNA did not show significant changes after exposure to VBL, as demonstrated by next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR quantification, suggesting that the inactivation process does not involve direct nucleic acid damage. To exclude the role of the culture suspension in the inactivation process, virus viability experiments were performed using different dilutions of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The results indicated that the suspension medium played a secondary role in virus inactivation, as viability did not increase with increasing DMEM dilution. Subsequent tests with three different antioxidants (NAC, AsA, and SOD) at different concentrations prevented viral inactivation, from 99.99% to 85.43% (with SOD 0.003 mM). Carbonylation of S and E proteins was more pronounced when viruses were suspended in DMEM rather than PBS, although the tests demonstrated that the intrinsic properties of the viral membrane were a crucial element to consider in relation to its susceptibility to VBL.

Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 inactivation mechanism using violet-blue light (405 nm)

Vicenti, Ilaria;
2025-01-01

Abstract

The study evaluated the effects of violet-blue light (VBL) on cell viability and replication, carbonylation of three structural proteins (S, E, and N) and one nonstructural protein (NSP13), and direct damage to the RNA of SARS-CoV-2. The virus was exposed to increasing doses of VBL along with influenza A and B viruses to compare their susceptibility. At the highest dose (21.6 J/cm2), SARS-CoV-2 was significantly more susceptible to VBL than the influenza viruses, with a reduction in viral titer of 2.33 log10. Viral RNA did not show significant changes after exposure to VBL, as demonstrated by next-generation sequencing and real-time PCR quantification, suggesting that the inactivation process does not involve direct nucleic acid damage. To exclude the role of the culture suspension in the inactivation process, virus viability experiments were performed using different dilutions of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The results indicated that the suspension medium played a secondary role in virus inactivation, as viability did not increase with increasing DMEM dilution. Subsequent tests with three different antioxidants (NAC, AsA, and SOD) at different concentrations prevented viral inactivation, from 99.99% to 85.43% (with SOD 0.003 mM). Carbonylation of S and E proteins was more pronounced when viruses were suspended in DMEM rather than PBS, although the tests demonstrated that the intrinsic properties of the viral membrane were a crucial element to consider in relation to its susceptibility to VBL.
2025
SARS-CoV-2 envelope
lipid peroxidation
protein carbonylation
reactive oxygen species
violet-blue light
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/14359
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
social impact