How the brain adapts to the absence of sensory inputs and motor outputs from early development is a key question in neuroscience. While sensory deprivation has long been known to trigger changes to cortical maps in sensory and motor cortex, e.g. due to blindness [1], deafness [2] or arm malformation [3], there is an ongoing debate on their functional relevance. For example, using fMRI, we have previously reported that the deprived sensorimotor hand territory of individuals born without a hand shows increased activity evoked by movements of the lips, feet and residual arm, when compared to two-handed controls [4,5]. This is consistent with the idea that the missing-hand area may be recruited to support increased representation of alternative intact body parts. However, changes to cortical map boundaries (i.e., remapping), as measured through fMRI, do not necessarily entail changed representational content and readout [3]. As such, the observed remapping may not subserve a functional role. By allowing to directly stimulate the motor cortex and measure the evoked muscular responses in various body parts, TMS provides a unique opportunity to causally assess the functional consequences of motor remapping.
Stimulating the deprived motor `hand' area causes facial muscle responses in one-handers
Danny Spampinato;
2021-01-01
Abstract
How the brain adapts to the absence of sensory inputs and motor outputs from early development is a key question in neuroscience. While sensory deprivation has long been known to trigger changes to cortical maps in sensory and motor cortex, e.g. due to blindness [1], deafness [2] or arm malformation [3], there is an ongoing debate on their functional relevance. For example, using fMRI, we have previously reported that the deprived sensorimotor hand territory of individuals born without a hand shows increased activity evoked by movements of the lips, feet and residual arm, when compared to two-handed controls [4,5]. This is consistent with the idea that the missing-hand area may be recruited to support increased representation of alternative intact body parts. However, changes to cortical map boundaries (i.e., remapping), as measured through fMRI, do not necessarily entail changed representational content and readout [3]. As such, the observed remapping may not subserve a functional role. By allowing to directly stimulate the motor cortex and measure the evoked muscular responses in various body parts, TMS provides a unique opportunity to causally assess the functional consequences of motor remapping.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

