PurposeLaryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease is a common problem usually diagnosed with white light laryngoscope and questionnaires. Some studies have proposed Narrow band imaging (NBI) laryngoscopy as a useful method for diagnosing LPR. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the potential use of NBI for the diagnosis and grading of LPR disease.MethodsAll patients underwent to the Reflux Symptom index (RSI) questionnaire and white light laryngoscope evaluation calculating Reflux Findings Score (RFS). Patients evaluated with white light laryngoscope with RFS ≥7 were enrolled in Group A, while patients with RFS <7 were enrolled in Group B. A comparison of both RFS scores, calculated with white light and NBI, was performed and patients affected by LPR visible only with NBI system were identified. NBI score was performed to improve the evaluation of LPR signs including a grading score that could help to classify different types of LPR damages. ResultsAnalysing the data of RFS estimated with white light, it was possible to diagnose LPR in 65% of patients enrolled in the study. In contrast RFS evaluated with NBI showed 88% of patients affected by LPR. Difference between resulted was statistically different. In group A, 64% presented a Grade 3 NBI score, 35% Grade 2 and none of the patients Grade 1. In group B, 33% presented a Grade 1 NBI score, 55% Grade 2 and 11% Grade 3. ConclusionResults of this preliminary study suggest that NBI could improve the identification and the grading of LPR signs.

Diagnosis and grading of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease with narrow band imaging: preliminary study

Pace A.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

PurposeLaryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease is a common problem usually diagnosed with white light laryngoscope and questionnaires. Some studies have proposed Narrow band imaging (NBI) laryngoscopy as a useful method for diagnosing LPR. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the potential use of NBI for the diagnosis and grading of LPR disease.MethodsAll patients underwent to the Reflux Symptom index (RSI) questionnaire and white light laryngoscope evaluation calculating Reflux Findings Score (RFS). Patients evaluated with white light laryngoscope with RFS ≥7 were enrolled in Group A, while patients with RFS <7 were enrolled in Group B. A comparison of both RFS scores, calculated with white light and NBI, was performed and patients affected by LPR visible only with NBI system were identified. NBI score was performed to improve the evaluation of LPR signs including a grading score that could help to classify different types of LPR damages. ResultsAnalysing the data of RFS estimated with white light, it was possible to diagnose LPR in 65% of patients enrolled in the study. In contrast RFS evaluated with NBI showed 88% of patients affected by LPR. Difference between resulted was statistically different. In group A, 64% presented a Grade 3 NBI score, 35% Grade 2 and none of the patients Grade 1. In group B, 33% presented a Grade 1 NBI score, 55% Grade 2 and 11% Grade 3. ConclusionResults of this preliminary study suggest that NBI could improve the identification and the grading of LPR signs.
2020
dental caries
enamel
MIH
molar incisor hypomineralization
restorative dentistry
Humans
Incisor
Molar
Prevalence
Dental Enamel Hypoplasia
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/16062
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
social impact