Purpose: This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results: The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures. Conclusions: AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.

How reliable is artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on CT images?

Ralli M.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: This study analysed the main artificial intelligence (AI) models for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma on computed tomography (CT), evaluating their performance and comparing them with each other. The increasing application of AI in radiology requires a systematic comparison of available methodologies. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, selecting relevant articles from the main databases. The included studies had to fulfil specific criteria regarding methodology, use of AI models for cholesteatoma diagnosis and results in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results: The meta-analysis included three studies evaluating the MobilenetV2, Densenet201 and Resnet50 AI models. All models demonstrated high levels of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma at CT. No statistically significant differences were found between the performance of the various models, suggesting a robust common diagnostic capability between the different neural network architectures. Conclusions: AI is making rapid progress in imaging, with recent studies already showing remarkable performance in cholesteatoma diagnosis. The speed of technological development is promising. However, to ensure safe and effective implementation in clinical practice, further studies are needed to validate and standardise these AI models. Future research should focus not only on the diagnostic accuracy, but also on the robustness, reproducibility and clinical integration of these emerging technologies.
2025
AI
Artificial intelligence
Cholesteatoma
CT
Meta-analysis
Otology
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0196070924003053-main.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.35 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/17225
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
social impact