Background:Altering surface characteristics by increasing its energy and hydrophilicity will accelerate the interaction between cells and implantsurface. Energy and hydrophilicity tend to disappear over a short time. The implant surface may be reactivated by the use of argonplasmaObjective:To assess bone density at cleaned and activated titanium implants using argon plasma.Methods:Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in eight Beagle dogs. After three months, four implants, two treatedwith argon plasma (test; plasma) and two left without treatment (control), were randomly installed in one side of the mandible.Abutments were applied on the implants and a non-submerged healing was allowed. After one month, the same surgical procedureswere adopted on the opposite side of the mandible. The animals were euthanized after one month and ground sections representingthe healing after 1 and 2 months were obtained for histological examination.Results:No statistically significant differences were found between test and control sites (p < 0.05). After 1 month of healing, new bone was32.5 ± 12.2% and 33.8 ± 8.8% at the plasma and control sites, respectively. After 2 months, the respective values were 50.8 ± 21.5%and 47.6 ± 15.6%.Conclusion:The treatment of the implant surface with argon plasma did not have a significant effect on bone density around implants

Effect of plasma of argon treated implants on bone density: A randomized, controlled, histomorphometric study in dogs

Canullo L;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background:Altering surface characteristics by increasing its energy and hydrophilicity will accelerate the interaction between cells and implantsurface. Energy and hydrophilicity tend to disappear over a short time. The implant surface may be reactivated by the use of argonplasmaObjective:To assess bone density at cleaned and activated titanium implants using argon plasma.Methods:Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in eight Beagle dogs. After three months, four implants, two treatedwith argon plasma (test; plasma) and two left without treatment (control), were randomly installed in one side of the mandible.Abutments were applied on the implants and a non-submerged healing was allowed. After one month, the same surgical procedureswere adopted on the opposite side of the mandible. The animals were euthanized after one month and ground sections representingthe healing after 1 and 2 months were obtained for histological examination.Results:No statistically significant differences were found between test and control sites (p < 0.05). After 1 month of healing, new bone was32.5 ± 12.2% and 33.8 ± 8.8% at the plasma and control sites, respectively. After 2 months, the respective values were 50.8 ± 21.5%and 47.6 ± 15.6%.Conclusion:The treatment of the implant surface with argon plasma did not have a significant effect on bone density around implants
2018
Osseointegration
Bone density
Dental implants
Plasma gases
Surface properties
Animals
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tanaka et al., 2018.pdf

non disponibili

Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 4.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.4 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/17377
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
social impact