Purpose: To correlate soft tissue thickness and peri-implant bone remodeling of platform-switching implants.Materials and Methods: This comparative prospective trial evaluated, for up to 3 years after implant loading,the influence of soft tissue thickness on changes in peri-implant marginal hard tissue levels. Any patient whowas partially edentate in the mandible and required at least two adjacent implant-supported restorationswas recruited at the University of Valencia in Spain. A 3-mm tissue punch biopsy, which corresponded to adiameter slightly smaller than the coronal diameter of the implants, was performed using a circular mucotome.Afterward, implants with a length of 10 to 13 mm and a diameter of 3.8 mm were inserted. Outcome measureswere implant and prosthesis survival rates, marginal hard tissue changes, any complications, and results ofmorphologic and histomorphometric analyses. Correlation between mucosa width components (epithelium,connective tissue, and epithelium and connective tissue) and radiographic bone loss at 1 and 3 years afterloading was performed at the patient level. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. Results: A total of 26samples in 26 patients with 68 implants were analyzed. The specimens were divided into two groups: group1 (16 patients, 40 implants), with thin mucosa (≤ 2 mm), and group 2 (10 patients, 28 implants), with thickmucosa (> 2 mm). Two dropouts (two specimens) were recorded at the 3-year follow-up. None of the implants ordefinitive prostheses failed during the healing period, resulting in an overall implant and prosthesis cumulativesurvival rate of 100%. No major biologic or mechanical complications were recorded. The mean (standarddeviation, SD) epithelium thickness was 430.33 (250.21) µm; the mean (SD) connective tissue thickness was1,324.31 (653.46) µm, and the mean (SD) mucosa thickness was 1,751.29 (759.53) µm. Comparisons ofradiographic bone loss between group 1 and group 2 failed to show any statistically significant differences atthe 1-year (P = .290) or 3-year (P = .090) follow-up examinations. Conclusion: The initial mucosa thicknesssurrounding a bone-level platform-switching implant seems not to influence the pattern of physiologic marginalbone loss
Mucosa thickness and peri-implant crestal bone stability: A clinical and histologic prospective cohort trial
Canullo L;
2017-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: To correlate soft tissue thickness and peri-implant bone remodeling of platform-switching implants.Materials and Methods: This comparative prospective trial evaluated, for up to 3 years after implant loading,the influence of soft tissue thickness on changes in peri-implant marginal hard tissue levels. Any patient whowas partially edentate in the mandible and required at least two adjacent implant-supported restorationswas recruited at the University of Valencia in Spain. A 3-mm tissue punch biopsy, which corresponded to adiameter slightly smaller than the coronal diameter of the implants, was performed using a circular mucotome.Afterward, implants with a length of 10 to 13 mm and a diameter of 3.8 mm were inserted. Outcome measureswere implant and prosthesis survival rates, marginal hard tissue changes, any complications, and results ofmorphologic and histomorphometric analyses. Correlation between mucosa width components (epithelium,connective tissue, and epithelium and connective tissue) and radiographic bone loss at 1 and 3 years afterloading was performed at the patient level. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05. Results: A total of 26samples in 26 patients with 68 implants were analyzed. The specimens were divided into two groups: group1 (16 patients, 40 implants), with thin mucosa (≤ 2 mm), and group 2 (10 patients, 28 implants), with thickmucosa (> 2 mm). Two dropouts (two specimens) were recorded at the 3-year follow-up. None of the implants ordefinitive prostheses failed during the healing period, resulting in an overall implant and prosthesis cumulativesurvival rate of 100%. No major biologic or mechanical complications were recorded. The mean (standarddeviation, SD) epithelium thickness was 430.33 (250.21) µm; the mean (SD) connective tissue thickness was1,324.31 (653.46) µm, and the mean (SD) mucosa thickness was 1,751.29 (759.53) µm. Comparisons ofradiographic bone loss between group 1 and group 2 failed to show any statistically significant differences atthe 1-year (P = .290) or 3-year (P = .090) follow-up examinations. Conclusion: The initial mucosa thicknesssurrounding a bone-level platform-switching implant seems not to influence the pattern of physiologic marginalbone loss| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
canullo camacho-alonso et al 2017.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
199.46 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
199.46 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

