The Italian institution of Support Administration allows a designated person to makehealthcare decisions on behalf of somebody incapable of clearly expressing their wishes.In fact, the Support Administrator is in charge of looking after the personal interests ofthe beneficiary.The designation of the Support Administrator as a tool for someone to make effectivetheir advance directives in case of an accident or of a serious illness is controversial in theItalian case law and literature. Italy currently lacks a legislation on advance directivesand living will, even if we can find some principles in the Convention on Human Rightsand Biomedicine, signed in Oviedo, and in the Italian Code of Medical Ethics and in theCode of Conduct for Italian Nurses.Due to this lack of regulation, guardianship judges have been asked from persons withoutany health problem to appoint the Support Administrator in order to ensure compliancewith their healthcare advance directives. An established jurisprudence upholds this kindof appeal, on the basis of article 408 of Italian Civil Code which reads as follow: « theSupport Administrator can be appointed in anticipation of an hypothetical futureincompetence ». With judgment No. 23707/2012 of 20 December 2012, ItalianSupreme Court has given preference to the opposite case law trend and has ruled that theincompetence of the beneficiary must be simultaneous with the designation of theSupport Administrator.This article considers the case law, both preceding and following judgment No. 23707/2012 of the Supreme Court, and aims at a review of the concept of advance directive. Inthe literature and in the case law the idea of advance directive is used even to describe apresent choice. We believe, though, that in these situations the person expresses wishes about a therapeutic project shared with the healthcare professionals and not to a singlemedical treatment.

AMMINISTRAZIONE DI SOSTEGNO E DIRETTIVE ANTICIPATE DI TRATTAMENTO

Bolcato, Matteo;
2016-01-01

Abstract

The Italian institution of Support Administration allows a designated person to makehealthcare decisions on behalf of somebody incapable of clearly expressing their wishes.In fact, the Support Administrator is in charge of looking after the personal interests ofthe beneficiary.The designation of the Support Administrator as a tool for someone to make effectivetheir advance directives in case of an accident or of a serious illness is controversial in theItalian case law and literature. Italy currently lacks a legislation on advance directivesand living will, even if we can find some principles in the Convention on Human Rightsand Biomedicine, signed in Oviedo, and in the Italian Code of Medical Ethics and in theCode of Conduct for Italian Nurses.Due to this lack of regulation, guardianship judges have been asked from persons withoutany health problem to appoint the Support Administrator in order to ensure compliancewith their healthcare advance directives. An established jurisprudence upholds this kindof appeal, on the basis of article 408 of Italian Civil Code which reads as follow: « theSupport Administrator can be appointed in anticipation of an hypothetical futureincompetence ». With judgment No. 23707/2012 of 20 December 2012, ItalianSupreme Court has given preference to the opposite case law trend and has ruled that theincompetence of the beneficiary must be simultaneous with the designation of theSupport Administrator.This article considers the case law, both preceding and following judgment No. 23707/2012 of the Supreme Court, and aims at a review of the concept of advance directive. Inthe literature and in the case law the idea of advance directive is used even to describe apresent choice. We believe, though, that in these situations the person expresses wishes about a therapeutic project shared with the healthcare professionals and not to a singlemedical treatment.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ADS RIML 2016.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 185.22 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
185.22 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/5828
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact