Treatment of EGJ Cancer within or outside clinical trials: Does the setting matter? A monocentric prospective observational study

Introduction: RCTs support neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery in Locally Advanced Esophago-Gastric Junction (LA-EGJ) adenocarcinoma. However, RCTs are performed in highly controlled settings with limited representativeness of real-life patients (RLS). Aim: To compare the outcomes in RLS and clinical trial settings. Methods: The outcomes of RLS, which comprised 125 patients consequently treated for LA-EGJ adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2017, were compared with the phase II trial (PIIS), performed on 65 patients from 2003 to 2011. Results: About half of RLS (51.2%) were treated with nCRT according to VR-protocol, 20.8% with standard-CRT according to CROSS/Al-Sarraf, 20% with CT alone. pCR was 36.8%, 28.6% and 9.1% after VR-protocol, standard-CRT, and chemotherapy respectively (p=0.082), while three-year overall survival (OS) was 58.6% (95% CI 43.2-71.1%), 32.8% (14.6-52.4%) and 44.8% (21.3-65.9%) respectively (p=0.030). With respect to PIIS, RLS had a higher proportion of cN+ (94% versus 54%; p<0.001), and a lower proportion of pCR after CT/CRT (23% versus 39%; p=0.041). Three-year OS was slightly higher, although not significantly, in PIIS (58.9%, 45.1-70.2%) than RLS (47.9%, 37.4-57.7%) and nearly identical to 3-year OS in RLS treated with VR-protocol. Discussion/conclusion: Real-life patients with EGJ adenocarcinoma have more advanced cancer at baseline, lower pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment than patients enrolled in clinical trials, but similar survival.