Introduction: The extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastases (the extension of neoplastic cells through the nodal capsule into the perinodal soft tissue) is a histological feature that has been considered a prognostic factor in several cancers, but the role in gastric cancer was not yet investigated. We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of ENE in patients affected by gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Material and Methods: Two independent authors searched major databases until 09/30/2015 to identify studies providing data on gastric cancer patients’ prognostic parameters and comparing patients with ENE (ENE+) vs intra-nodal extension (ENE−). The data were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) for the number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Nine studies followed up 3250 patients with gastric cancer (1064 ENE+ and 2186 ENE−). ENE+ was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.70; 95 % CI: 1.43–2.03, I2 = 66 %; HR = 2.14; 95 % CI: 1.66–2.75, I2 = 0 %), cancer-specific mortality (RR = 1.59; 95 % CI: 1.42–1.79; HR = 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.19–1.96), and disease recurrence (RR = 3.43, 95 % CI: 1.80–6.54, I2 = 0 %). Discussion: Judging from our results, ENE in gastric cancer patients should be considered for prognostic purposes from the gross sample to the pathology report. © 2016, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.

Extranodal Extension of Nodal Metastases Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Veronese, Nicola;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: The extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastases (the extension of neoplastic cells through the nodal capsule into the perinodal soft tissue) is a histological feature that has been considered a prognostic factor in several cancers, but the role in gastric cancer was not yet investigated. We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of ENE in patients affected by gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Material and Methods: Two independent authors searched major databases until 09/30/2015 to identify studies providing data on gastric cancer patients’ prognostic parameters and comparing patients with ENE (ENE+) vs intra-nodal extension (ENE−). The data were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) for the number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Nine studies followed up 3250 patients with gastric cancer (1064 ENE+ and 2186 ENE−). ENE+ was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.70; 95 % CI: 1.43–2.03, I2 = 66 %; HR = 2.14; 95 % CI: 1.66–2.75, I2 = 0 %), cancer-specific mortality (RR = 1.59; 95 % CI: 1.42–1.79; HR = 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.19–1.96), and disease recurrence (RR = 3.43, 95 % CI: 1.80–6.54, I2 = 0 %). Discussion: Judging from our results, ENE in gastric cancer patients should be considered for prognostic purposes from the gross sample to the pathology report. © 2016, The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
2016
Gastric cancer
Lymph node metastasis
ENE
Extranodal extension
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/7147
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 44
social impact