BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) oHen complicates the clinical course of cancer. The risk is further increased by chemotherapy, but thetrade-oJ between safety and eJicacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is uncertain. This isthe third update of a review first published in February 2012.ObjectivesTo assess the eJicacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis for VTE in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy comparedwith placebo or no thromboprophylaxis, or an active control intervention.Search methodsFor this update the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHLdatabases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 3 August2020. We also searched the reference lists of identified studies and contacted content experts and trialists for relevant references.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials comparing any oral or parenteral anticoagulant or mechanical intervention to no thromboprophylaxis orplacebo, or comparing two diJerent anticoagulants.Data collection and analysisWe extracted data on risk of bias, participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes including symptomatic VTE and major bleedingas the primary eJectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively. We applied GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.Main resultsWe identified six additional randomised controlled trials (3326 participants) for this update, bringing the included study total to 32 trials(15,678 participants), all evaluating pharmacological interventions and performed mainly in people with locally advanced or metastaticcancer. The certainty of the evidence ranged from high to very low across the diJerent outcomes and comparisons. The main limitingfactors were imprecision and risk of bias.Thromboprophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants (direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban) may decrease the incidence ofsymptomatic VTE (RR 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.06; 1526 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence); and probablyincrease the risk of major bleeding compared with placebo (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.68; 1494 participants, 3 studies; moderate-certaintyevidence).When compared with no thromboprophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE (RR 0.62,95% CI 0.46 to 0.83; 3931 participants, 11 studies; high-certainty evidence); and probably increased the risk of major bleeding events (RR1.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.35; 7282 participants, 15 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).In participants with multiple myeloma, LMWH resulted in lower symptomatic VTE compared with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin (RR0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.83; 439 participants, 1 study; high-certainty evidence), while LMWH probably lowers symptomatic VTE more thanaspirin (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.17; 781 participants, 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Major bleeding was observed in none of theparticipants with multiple myeloma treated with LMWH or warfarin and in less than 1% of those treated with aspirin.Only one study evaluated unfractionated heparin against no thromboprophylaxis, but did not report on VTE nor major bleeding.When compared with placebo or no thromboprophylaxis, warfarin may importantly reduce symptomatic VTE (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.20;311 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in major bleeding (RR 3.82, 95% CI 0.97 to 15.04; 994participants, 4 studies; low-certainty evidence).Antithrombin versus no antithrombin was evaluated in one study involving paediatric patients. This study did not report on symptomaticVTE but did report any VTE (symptomatic and incidental VTE). The eJect of antithrombin on any VTE and major bleeding is uncertain (anyVTE RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.73 and major bleeding RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.03 to 18.57; 85 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence).Authors' conclusionsIn ambulatory cancer patients, primary thromboprophylaxis with direct factor Xa inhibitors may reduce the incidence of symptomatic VTE(low-certainty evidence) and probably increases the risk of major bleeding (moderate-certainty evidence) when compared with placebo.LMWH decreased the incidence of symptomatic VTE (high-certainty evidence), but increased the risk of major bleeding (moderate-certaintyevidence) when compared with placebo or no thromboprophylaxis. Evidence for the use of thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulants otherthan direct factor Xa inhibitors and LMWH is limited. More studies are warranted to evaluate the eJicacy and safety of primary prophylaxisin specific types of chemotherapeutic agents and types of cancer, such as gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer.
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Rutjes, Anne;
2020-01-01
Abstract
BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) oHen complicates the clinical course of cancer. The risk is further increased by chemotherapy, but thetrade-oJ between safety and eJicacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is uncertain. This isthe third update of a review first published in February 2012.ObjectivesTo assess the eJicacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis for VTE in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy comparedwith placebo or no thromboprophylaxis, or an active control intervention.Search methodsFor this update the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHLdatabases and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 3 August2020. We also searched the reference lists of identified studies and contacted content experts and trialists for relevant references.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials comparing any oral or parenteral anticoagulant or mechanical intervention to no thromboprophylaxis orplacebo, or comparing two diJerent anticoagulants.Data collection and analysisWe extracted data on risk of bias, participant characteristics, interventions, and outcomes including symptomatic VTE and major bleedingas the primary eJectiveness and safety outcomes, respectively. We applied GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.Main resultsWe identified six additional randomised controlled trials (3326 participants) for this update, bringing the included study total to 32 trials(15,678 participants), all evaluating pharmacological interventions and performed mainly in people with locally advanced or metastaticcancer. The certainty of the evidence ranged from high to very low across the diJerent outcomes and comparisons. The main limitingfactors were imprecision and risk of bias.Thromboprophylaxis with direct oral anticoagulants (direct factor Xa inhibitors apixaban and rivaroxaban) may decrease the incidence ofsymptomatic VTE (RR 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 1.06; 1526 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence); and probablyincrease the risk of major bleeding compared with placebo (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.68; 1494 participants, 3 studies; moderate-certaintyevidence).When compared with no thromboprophylaxis, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE (RR 0.62,95% CI 0.46 to 0.83; 3931 participants, 11 studies; high-certainty evidence); and probably increased the risk of major bleeding events (RR1.63, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.35; 7282 participants, 15 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).In participants with multiple myeloma, LMWH resulted in lower symptomatic VTE compared with the vitamin K antagonist warfarin (RR0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.83; 439 participants, 1 study; high-certainty evidence), while LMWH probably lowers symptomatic VTE more thanaspirin (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.17; 781 participants, 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Major bleeding was observed in none of theparticipants with multiple myeloma treated with LMWH or warfarin and in less than 1% of those treated with aspirin.Only one study evaluated unfractionated heparin against no thromboprophylaxis, but did not report on VTE nor major bleeding.When compared with placebo or no thromboprophylaxis, warfarin may importantly reduce symptomatic VTE (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.20;311 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) and may result in a large increase in major bleeding (RR 3.82, 95% CI 0.97 to 15.04; 994participants, 4 studies; low-certainty evidence).Antithrombin versus no antithrombin was evaluated in one study involving paediatric patients. This study did not report on symptomaticVTE but did report any VTE (symptomatic and incidental VTE). The eJect of antithrombin on any VTE and major bleeding is uncertain (anyVTE RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.73 and major bleeding RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.03 to 18.57; 85 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence).Authors' conclusionsIn ambulatory cancer patients, primary thromboprophylaxis with direct factor Xa inhibitors may reduce the incidence of symptomatic VTE(low-certainty evidence) and probably increases the risk of major bleeding (moderate-certainty evidence) when compared with placebo.LMWH decreased the incidence of symptomatic VTE (high-certainty evidence), but increased the risk of major bleeding (moderate-certaintyevidence) when compared with placebo or no thromboprophylaxis. Evidence for the use of thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulants otherthan direct factor Xa inhibitors and LMWH is limited. More studies are warranted to evaluate the eJicacy and safety of primary prophylaxisin specific types of chemotherapeutic agents and types of cancer, such as gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2020_942_primary_prophylaxis_chemo.pdf
non disponibili
Licenza:
Dominio pubblico
Dimensione
1.57 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.57 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.