There are different techniques for drilling the femoral tunnel in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but their influence in the bone tunnel enlargement in unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two different surgical techniques for evaluating femoral tunnel enlargement in ACLR. The hypothesis was that tunnel placement using the outside-in technique leads to less tunnel enlargement compared to the transtibial technique.METHODS:Forty-four patients treated for ACLR between March 2013 and March 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this study. According to the surgical technique, subjects were assigned to Group A (Out-in) or Group B (Transtibial). All patients underwent CT examination in order to evaluate the femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. Moreover, all patients were evaluated with the Lachman test and pivot shift test, and the KT1000 arthrometer was used to measure the anterior laxity of the knee. A subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee score, Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale. All patients were assessed after 24 months of follow-up.RESULTS:At the final follow-up, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in femoral tunnel enlargement between the two groups at all four femoral levels in favor of the out-in group. No statistical significant differences were found in the objective and subjective clinical outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:In ACLR with a suspension system, the outside-in technique leads to less enlargement of the femoral tunnel lower than the transtibial technique.KEYWORDS:Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; CT imaging; Drilling technique; Femoral tunnel enlargementPMID: 28389757 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-1950-8Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Google+LinkOut - more resources

Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study

GUZZINI, Matteo;
2017-01-01

Abstract

There are different techniques for drilling the femoral tunnel in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but their influence in the bone tunnel enlargement in unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two different surgical techniques for evaluating femoral tunnel enlargement in ACLR. The hypothesis was that tunnel placement using the outside-in technique leads to less tunnel enlargement compared to the transtibial technique.METHODS:Forty-four patients treated for ACLR between March 2013 and March 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this study. According to the surgical technique, subjects were assigned to Group A (Out-in) or Group B (Transtibial). All patients underwent CT examination in order to evaluate the femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. Moreover, all patients were evaluated with the Lachman test and pivot shift test, and the KT1000 arthrometer was used to measure the anterior laxity of the knee. A subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee score, Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale. All patients were assessed after 24 months of follow-up.RESULTS:At the final follow-up, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in femoral tunnel enlargement between the two groups at all four femoral levels in favor of the out-in group. No statistical significant differences were found in the objective and subjective clinical outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:In ACLR with a suspension system, the outside-in technique leads to less enlargement of the femoral tunnel lower than the transtibial technique.KEYWORDS:Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; CT imaging; Drilling technique; Femoral tunnel enlargementPMID: 28389757 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-1950-8Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Google+LinkOut - more resources
2017
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
CT imaging
drilling technique
femoral tunnel enlargement
surgery
orthopedics and sports medicine
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/9589
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
social impact