We describe the use of a FISH protocol for detecting chromosome microdeletions in peripheral blood smear leukocytes. This method has the advantage of a smaller sample requirement than classical metaphase chromosome analysis and the potential for analysis of a larger number of chromosome microdeletions using a routine blood smear. A selected series of 10 DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) and 12 Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) patients were correctly diagnosed by this method confirming results obtained by molecular cytogenetic metaphases. These results support effectiveness of interphase FISH analysis on peripheral blood smears as a focused, single-step method for the detection of chromosome microdeletions.

Diagnosis of DiGeorge and Williams syndromes using FISH analysis of peripheral blood smears

Novelli A.;
1999-01-01

Abstract

We describe the use of a FISH protocol for detecting chromosome microdeletions in peripheral blood smear leukocytes. This method has the advantage of a smaller sample requirement than classical metaphase chromosome analysis and the potential for analysis of a larger number of chromosome microdeletions using a routine blood smear. A selected series of 10 DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) and 12 Williams-Beuren syndrome (WBS) patients were correctly diagnosed by this method confirming results obtained by molecular cytogenetic metaphases. These results support effectiveness of interphase FISH analysis on peripheral blood smears as a focused, single-step method for the detection of chromosome microdeletions.
1999
Chromosome microdeletion
DiGeorge syndrome
FISH
Williams-Beuren syndrome
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14245/11532
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
social impact